« Back
Mainstream versus Alternative Sciences, which one explains astrology better?
Coming from a mainstream physics educational background, I find that my attempt to explain how astrology works is hindered by a lack of appropriate physical models and definitions that would both make sense to me and make it easier for my audience to understand what I知 trying to say. Being a highly sensitive individual with extrasensory abilities, I can feel and visualize the mechanism of planetary effects on humans. In other words, believe it or not, I am feeling the planetary vibes on a physical level. Feeling is one thing, explaining what I知 feeling in scientific terms is another.
Finding the right scientific terminology for my explanations is a bit challenging. When I was thinking about the connection between the heavens and life on Earth, and searching for solutions for unsolved problems in astrology, I came to the realization that the mainstream version of reality I was taught in school was invalid. It was invalid because it did not explain reality in all of its expressions. It did not explain many of my experiences when I was young and studying astrology, such as observing an amazing correlation between astrological interpretations and real human behavior, having lucid dreams and psychic visions.
Read the entire article below on Page 38 of the OPA Magazine "The Career Astrologer":
